SEO QC Reviewer — Claude AI Skill for Quality Control Across All SEO Deliverables

“Review my content” gets a general quality read — no systematic check of intent match, heading hierarchy, E-E-A-T signals, internal link requirements, or SERP gap coverage

Runs the Content SEO QC checklist — 25+ specific checkpoints across intent, structure, E-E-A-T, readability, and red flags — with every failure flagged by severity

Audit review says “looks comprehensive” — doesn’t check whether issues are quantified, prioritised by severity, or connected to business impact

Runs the SEO Audit QC checklist — flags if issues aren’t quantified (“212 pages” vs “some pages”), if severity tiers are missing, if GSC data is absent, if recommendations are generic rather than site-specific

Keyword list review looks at the list in isolation — doesn’t check funnel coverage, intent classification accuracy, cannibalization risk, or whether quick wins are separated from long-term plays

Runs the Keyword Research QC checklist — checks TOFU/MOFU/BOFU distribution, intent accuracy, data integrity (source, monthly averages vs. spikes), prioritisation logic, and cannibalization flags

All issues presented with equal weight — a missing Oxford comma and a wrong canonical tag both appear as bullet points with no indication that one could cause a ranking drop

Every finding categorised by severity tier — 🔴 Critical (fix before shipping), 🟠 Gaps (incomplete but not broken), 🟡 Optimisations (good but could be sharper) — plus a ranked Priority Action List

One reviewer perspective — the review reflects SEO knowledge but misses the conversion specialist checking if landing page copy serves dual intent, or the data analyst checking if reporting metrics are sourced correctly

Five simultaneous reviewer personas — Senior Technical SEO, Content Strategist, Data Analyst, Conversion Specialist, and SEO Director each applying their own lens to the same deliverable

Paste the deliverable directly, share a URL, or describe what you’ve built. The skill identifies the deliverable type from the 11-category table and loads the matching QC checklist. If your submission spans multiple types (e.g., an audit that includes content recommendations), it runs all relevant checklists and merges the findings.

Each persona applies their own lens to the same deliverable. The Technical SEO checks redirect logic and canonical implementation. The Content Strategist checks intent match and E-E-A-T signals. The Data Analyst checks metric sourcing and data integrity. The Conversion Specialist checks CTA placement and conversion-SEO alignment. The SEO Director checks prioritisation and business impact framing.

QC in progress — Content Brief for "best CRM for small business"

Content Strategist: Intent is commercial investigation — brief says informational. Mismatch.
Data Analyst: Word count target (2,000 words) not grounded in SERP — top 3 average 3,400.
Conversion Specialist: No CTA guidance — writer has no direction on what to push readers toward.
Technical SEO: No internal linking targets specified — missed PageRank flow opportunity.
SEO Director: No differentiation angle — this brief will produce generic content that can't outrank existing results.

Output is always structured the same way — no matter what deliverable was reviewed. Critical issues first (must fix before shipping), then gaps, then optimisation opportunities, then a brief acknowledgement of what’s working, then the Priority Action List.

🔴 Critical Issues
  1. Intent mismatch — brief targets commercial keyword with informational structure
     Fix: Redefine as product comparison page, add CTA guidance, include pricing section

🟠 Gaps
  1. No internal linking targets — specify 3–5 pages to link to with anchor text
  2. Word count 40% below SERP average — update to 3,400-word target

🟡 Optimisation Opportunities
  1. Add competitor comparison table — appears in 4/5 top-ranking pages
  2. Include expert quote / stat guidance for E-E-A-T

✅ What's Working
  · Primary keyword clearly stated
  · Secondary keywords list is solid — good long-tail coverage

🎯 Priority Action List
  1. Correct intent definition and restructure to commercial format
  2. Add internal linking targets
  3. Revise word count guidance to 3,400
  4. Add differentiation angle: original data or unique comparison angle